• Home > Research Ethics

Research Ethics

 

Preamble

1. Purpose

The Research Ethics Guidelines (hereafter "Guidelines") for authors, editors, and readers, and for all members, including the Research Ethics Committee, aim to prevent research misconduct and provide a fair standard with which to ascertain the verities when research misconduct occurs.

2. Scope

The Guidelines apply to all of the members of the English Language and Literature Association of Korea (hereafter "ELLAK") and those who submit and review the submissions for publication in The Journal of English Language and Literature (hereafter "Journal").

3. Applicable Date

These Guidelines take effect from November 30, 2007.

Chapter 1 Research Ethics Guidelines

Author Code of Ethics [Articles 1-4]

1. Plagiarism

The submitting author shall not take any or all of others' research without acknowledgment or, depending upon a particular case, pre-arranged permission. So doing shall be regarded as an act of plagiarism.

2. Research contribution

The contributor is preferred who has done some original, innovative research.

3. Dual publications or re-publications

The submitting author shall not send the same manuscript to two publishers at the same time for publication; nor shall research be re-published. If the author wishes to revise and publish research as a new article, the editor responsible for the previous publication of the research must be notified and full information about the previous publication, including editor and publisher, shall be provided.

4. Revision

Where possible, the submitting author should revise the manuscript according to the reviewers' recommendations. Non-compliance with the recommendations of the reviewers should be justified by providing reasons and evidence.

Chapter 2 The Research Ethics Regulations [Articles 1-10]

1. Pledge

All the members of the ELLAK shall pledge themselves to observe the Guidelines.

2. The Ethics Committee

One of the members on the Ethics Committee (hereafter "Committee") shall be appointed by the Committee members to be the Chair and approved by the Board of Directors of ELLAK. The number of the Committee shall be five. If a member submits a manuscript, a new member shall be appointed while it is being reviewed.

3. Committee Members

(1) The Committee shall have one Chair and one Secretary.

(2) The Chair shall be selected from the Committee members and the Chair shall appoint a Secretary.

(3) The Chair shall lead the Committee and the Secretary shall take care of Committee affairs.

4. Committee Functions

The Committee shall manage all affairs concerning the Guidelines and make decisions when research misconduct occurs.

5. Committee Meeting

(1) The Chair shall convene a meeting.

(2) A meeting shall be held when requested by the Chair or more than three members of Committee.

(3) More than half of the Committee members shall be present, and decisions shall be made by more than half of the members present.

(4) The meeting's decision process should be kept confidential.

6. Request for Review

(1) Any properly concerned person may request a written review.

(2) The Chair shall convene a meeting as soon as possible when such a request is received.

7. Procedure

(1) When a case of research misconduct occurs, the question of whether it will be reviewed by the Committee or referred to the outside members shall be decided by the Committee.

(2) In the event that the Committee decides to perform the review, the Committee shall make a decision on a case after full discussion. The Committee can ask the submitting author of the manuscript under study, the reviewer who has raised the question, and if necessary others for an interview. The one whose manuscript is in doubt should comply with the Committee's summons. A submitting author's non-compliance shall be considered non-observance of the Guidelines.

(3) The Committee shall allow the submitting author a full and complete opportunity for self defense.

(4) The Committee shall not reveal details concerning the submitting author until a final decision is made.

(5) The Committee shall keep the review process in written form and keep it with the submitting author's signature put on it.

8. Report of Committee Review Result

The Committee should report the result to the President of the ELLAK. The report should include:

(1) The contents of the research misconduct

(2) The finding process

(3) The basis and proof of the decision

(4) The process of the submitter's justification

(5) Punitive measures, if any.

9. Punitive Measures

When the Committee recommends a punitive measure, the President of the ELLAK shall convene a meeting and take the punitive measure. The kinds of punitive measures are:

(1) Admonition

(2) Suspension or deprivation of one's membership of the ELLAK

(3) Barring submission for three years from the date of decision

10. The revision of Guidelines is pursuant to the procedure of revision. When the Guidelines are revised, the revisions will be observed by all the members without additional pledge.

Addendum

The Research Ethics Guidelines and Regulations take effect as from November 30, 2007, when it was first established.

 

 


#1607 Gwanghwamun Officia Building 92, Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03186 Republic of Korea
Tel 82-2-738-1198 / Fax 82-2-733-6502 / E-mail ellak1198@hanmail.net
Copyright @ All Right Reserved ELLAK